Magazine

Special Features
Recent Features
-
How to Control Extreme Eating
Over the last several decades, food producers have discovered that we have a seemingly insatiable desire for sugar and salt. They’ve responded by stuffing our food with mind-boggling amounts of these substances. This full-scale assault on our taste buds has the dangerous side effect of making us want more food.
-
A Painless Future for Diabetes Blood Sugar Testing?
How new technology could replace needle-based diabetes blood tests with only a drop of saliva.
-
10 Great Low-Glycemic Snacks
Low-glycemic foods are often rich in fiber, protein, or fat, though it’s not smart to eat fatty foods just for the sake of your blood sugar unless those fats are “good” (unsaturated) fats.
-
10 Secrets for Healthier Grocery Shopping
Learn to avoid the common errors consumer often make when choosing their food products.
-
Fight Diabetes: 5 Moves for a Longer Life
Diabetes stats just keep spiking — a staggering 350 million people around the globe now have the disease. That means more heart attacks, more strokes, and a shorter life expectancy, even if you're otherwise healthy. Eat right; exercise more — the advice is simple but sometimes hard to follow. What do top experts suggest for closing that gap?


















Post a comment
6 comments
The meter in the display is showing "US" readings. In Canada we use the other format. Blood levels should be between 4 - 7. Being a Canadian magazine, I think you should publish Canadian items
I agree with Anne Fitzgerald that Canadian glucose readings should be used everywhere in Canadian Readers Digest. No one here understands US measurements
I also agree with Ann Fitzgerald and Will Jacomen.
I also think readings should be shown in mmol/L. Having been a type 1 diabetic for 20+ years, I'm used to seeing the different US readings, but it can be confusing for new diabetics and others who are just learning about diabetes.
Regarding "Tech Solutions for Diabetes" in your July issue. As nice as continuous glucose monitoring sounds the costs are prohibitive. I have been a type 1 diabetic for 44 years. I live in Alberta and have a very good extended medical plan associated with my job - $4000 per year of diabetic supplies are currently covered on top of my insulin costs. Even with that I could just barely dent the surface of the monthly costs for CGM. All previous diabetic technology breakthroughs have been expensive, but this is ridiculous. I think if this is mentioned again in an article that this side should also be looked at.
I agree with the previous comments regarding the picture of the American glucometer. It may seem a silly thing to criticize, but many sites and other resources only give information in terms of either the Canadian way or the American one, seldom both. A very useful article to those of us too ignorant to learn both measurement styles would be one that teaches the conversion in an easy to understand way. I know that I'm ignorant enough not to have learned this and there are probably many others too. I suppose this means that if I were to have a diabetic emergency whilst in The States I wouldn't understand the numbers of any other meter than my own...this could seriously affect the outcome of such an emergency situation. Do you think there is an easy way to explain both systems and make them understandably interchangeable?