8 Reasons Babies Are Smarter Than You Think
Chubby, cherubic and drooly, sure, but babies are much more than lovable lumps. Discover how fascinating new studies are revealing the true genius in those ga-gas and goo-goos.
How Maternity Leave Is Failing Canadian Women
Increasing the birthrate. Letting mothers take care of their young children without damaging their careers. Extended maternity leave was enacted for all the right reasons. So what went wrong?
(Photo: Corbis)
Veronica Wong was a sales manager for a Vancouver yoga-wear company. She oversaw a team and sold bulk orders to her own clients. After three years at the company, she was happy with her position, her pay and her boss. She also wanted to have a baby.
“Don’t worry,” the company’s owner told her when he found out that she was pregnant. The two worked out a plan: Her boss would hire an interim sales manager, who would transfer to another team when Wong’s mat leave ended. For her part, Wong, now 33, promised that when she returned she would resume most of her travel duties. She worked up until the day before her January 2009 delivery. She felt secure, knowing her job would be there for her when she got back. “You can transition slowly,” her boss said about her eventual return.
A year later, Wong’s comeback did not go as planned. Her sales accounts weren’t given back. Her managerial responsibilities were gone: her replacement continued to supervise the other sales reps. Worst of all, she was moved from a salary to an hourly wage. This adjustment, combined with the loss of her sales accounts, shrank her pay by over 60 percent.
“I understand that it was a small company and things shift,” Wong says. “If my duties changed, that’s okay, but things need to be on an even keel to what it was like before.” She sent an email to her boss, explaining her issues and asking to work together towards a solution.
“I feel like you’ve lost your motivation,” he replied. “You chose to have a family and not a career.” Wong then had a series of arguments with him, demanding to at least have her benefits reinstated. In June 2010, five months after her return to work, she was fired.
Next: How Canadian mat leave fails to
live up to its promise.
Sponsored Links
Looking for more great advice? Sign up to our newsletter for more useful tips, delivered straight to your inbox.
Recent Features
-
-
8 Ways to Save On Back To School
Don't stress about school before it's even started. Follow these easy school supply budgeting tips for peace of mind and A+ savings.
-
How to Start an Online Mom's Support Group
Today’s moms are reaching out to create their own social circles, and online groups dedicated to moms and their interests are popping up all over the web. Meet two trail-blazing moms and see how their online groups have helped women navigate the challenges of motherhood.
-
The Best Canadian Cities to Raise a Family
When it comes to parenting, not all Canadian cities are created equal. We looked at our provincial capitals and cities with a population of over 80,000 to find you the most family-friendly communities in the country.
-
Canada's Top 10 Mommy Bloggers
For most of the country’s nearly 4,000 mommy blogs, the payback is simple: being heard. Learn, laugh, and cry with ten of the loudest moms in Canada. (And one daddy blogger, too.)
-
The Sport of Motherhood
No matter how far they go in life, children will always depend on their parents. A mother explains why come crunch time, she's still who her son turns to.
-
Why Letting Your Kids Go Can Be So Hard
At every stage, motherhood requires you to renegotiate the boundaries you share with your children. A mother shares why letting go of her sons as they grow up is so bittersweet.
-
6 Surprising Ways Pregnancy Changes a Mother's Brain
Pregnancy doesn't just change a woman's body, it also rewires her brain. Discover the mind-bending ideas and emotions a new baby can bring.
-
Motherhood's First Lesson
The suprising challenges a mother faces after giving birth to her first child.
-
Fighting the Clock: The Risks of an Older Pregnancy
Tick tock, tick tock. Postponing children carries elevated risks. Before you opt for a baby past your child breaing prime, here's what you need to know.
-
4 Child Education Apps That Make Learning Fun
Looking for a fun way to get your child excited about reading, math and programming, or just letting their imagination run wild? Try these interactive back-to-school season apps.
-
Does Breastfeeding Improve Behaviour?
World Breastfeeding Week (August 1-7) advocates for breastfeeding and the many health benefits it brings to babies. Is better behaviour one of them?
-
9 Fun Father’s Day Activities to Plan
This Father’s Day, take Dad out for something that you both can enjoy. Check out these easy and fun activities.
-
How Can We Protect Our Children from Bullying?
In March 2000 an honour-roll student named Hamed Nastoh jumped off the Pattullo Bridge in New Westminster, B. C. Hamed, 14, left a seven-page note that said he was killing himself because his classmates tormented him with names like gay or faggot. He had never told his mother he was being bullied.
-
13 Tips to Increase Your Family's Happiness and Health
Tolstoy was right—happy families are all alike. At least they share certain basic characteristics. Here are a few of the foundations experts say are key to a loving, cheerful home:
Magazine
Special Features
Contribute to Reader's Digest
Advertisement
FTHFTH_health_chanel
Shopping Spree
With Our Partners
Contests
"Spring Into Health" contest
Enter the "Spring Into Health" contest for a chance to win 1 of 3 prizes!
Lakota Natural Getaway Contest
Enter for a chance to win a 4-night stay for two at the Fairmont Chateau Whistler
Special Moments Photo Contest
Enter for a chance to win a Hallmark prize pack worth $500, and be featured in a future issue of Our Canada magazine!
Most Popular Stories
- Rated
- Emailed
- Commented
Shop With Us
Get expert advice on all your health matters
Advertisement
Post a comment
35 comments
While this article was an interesting cautionary tale for the challenges moms (and dads) might face with employers, it negates to mention the two biggest issues with Canada's maternity leave benefits: 1) It is tied to income, so mothers in the lowest income brackets receive the least support (which is counter to the idea of supporting new families) 2) It is tied to employment. If you are unemployed, a student or at home with a child when you become pregnant, you will receive no income support.
This leaves both employees and employers in an untenable situation - moms have to return to work when baby #1 is a year old if they wish to bank EI hours to get support for baby #2. This lengthens the overall career interruption, makes it difficult to plan to take a period off, have all the kids you plan to etc. It may also be contributing to smaller family sizes (as children are more widely spaced, and moms wait until they are more secure in their jobs)
As an employer, I have even had employees hide their pregnancy when applying for permanent work so they could get the job before their mat leave. I would strongly advocate for a set parental support amount that is provided to a new parent regardless of income or employment status (in fact you could claw back from higher income families) - allowing families to plan their kids, have them back to back if desired and them return to work when they are ready. Obviously, durations of job protection would have to be separated from this idea.
Let me guess, brainwash Canadian women into giving up their one year mat. leave. Stephen Harper won't rest until he dismantles everything good about Canada. ....
In a way it was nice to find out the problem is systemic - and wasn't just me. I was downsized 3 months after returning to a job that was stripped of all "real" responsibility. They said the position was no longer needed - within 9 months they hired someone in a similar position but changed the job title. So much for non-profit sector being any better to its people.
The majority of the focus in this article seemed to be about the challenges for some when returning to work after mat leave. One key thing that was skimmed right over, is the fact that yes, you can take a year off, "paid", if you and your new family, (with many new and extra expenses), can AFFORD to live on 55% or less since it is capped! In my case it was actually 42% of my usual wage, which forced me to go back after 8.5 months, at which point we had already racked up debt that we never had before. We did not want a huge age gap between our children, so we had our second (and last) child 2.5 years later. I was only able to stay off 4 months so that we didn't totally sink ourselves in debt. It certainally didn't work out to be just as easy-peasy as it is made out to be! The reality is, very few people are able to live on a fraction of their income with extra expenses to cover in the mean time. And by the way, I have been working and PAYING INTO the EI system for 20 years! Quite frankly, I feel that those who don't work and are on welfare get many more handouts than the rest of us on OUR backs!
I had 2 maternity leaves with the same organization and they were extremely accommodating. Sometimes it's where you work that will determine your experience.
I've had two maternity leaves with two different employers. Both of my employers were very accommodating and I found the transition back to work to be easy and almost seamless. With my second leave I didn't have a full year so my employer did not have to guarantee my position when I returned. To ensure there was no question about returning, my director worked with HR to put me on a 14 month leave, not tied to maternity (my request for extra time). In both cases, my employer saw the value of me as an employee and they also recognised the importance of the maternity leave program for ensuring healthy Canadian families. My employers also never asked me if I would be returning. They just made sure everything was in order if I did.
I have taken 2 trips down the maternity leave route now. I enjoyed my year but looked forward to going back to work. My employer was great. They worked with me to juggle all of my duties. And when I came back off of my second maternity leave i got a raise. They even moved me to a new position and told me to make my own hours around our family schedule as i have a husband who works away half the year.
I know that there are challenges and problems with the Maternity leave system in Canada. But I would still like to say that I am grateful that there is anything available to us. I took Mat. leave with my 1st and 3rd, with my second I was self employed so I saved 1/2 my income for a year to give myself a year off afterwards. Consider the plight of American women who have nothing. Yes, some of the challenges need to be addressed but we should also be grateful that we have something.
I have taken two maternity leaves with the same employer and both have been great. I am so appreciative for my year off with each of my children, I could not imagine only having 6 months or less. We made do with the less income, because the trade off was worth totally worth it. My employer was great in ensuring my transition back was relatively seamless after both leaves, and no aspect of my job changed during either of my leaves. I consider my experience a win for me and my family.
This article is BS. A years maternity leave is awesome. So what if your position is down graded at least you have a year with your baby, money, and then a job to go back to. If all you care about is maintains status quo with your company then don't get pregnant or move to the States where there is no mat leave or jobs.
If you can not afford to have children, then you should not be having children. Period. Someone commented about how they only get 55% of their income while they are off. Be grateful you get ANYTHING! You are NOT working, or contributing to your employer while you have decided to raise your own family, you really expect the government to hand you 100% of what you would have been making if you were working? That is absolutely ridiculous. If you can not afford to raise a child on ZERO income from one spouse for one year, then I am sorry, you are in no financial situation to be having children. Back in the day, when women stayed at home to raise children, the government did not pay them a salary to do so. No, they had to make sure that they as a family had enough income with one working parent to support the household. And if not, well then you didn't have a child. I support what is currently in place for new mothers, 1 year mat leave and the government will give you half of what you would have made if you were working, AND guarantee you a job is still available for you when you are done..geez, what more do you want people?? EI is not here to fund your family plans and to fulfill your lifeling desire of having children, it is to help people out who are on hard times, and if your times are so hard...why are you having children? iI 55% is not enough for you, then you fall into that bracket of people unready to have children. Be grateful you get anything at all!
I was fortunate to be a contract worker for a Union when i became pregnant with my son, 12 years ago. His delivery coincided three months before the January 2001 full year maternity leave. Being said, i had finished out an already existing unemployment claim and then went right into my maternity benefits (six months at the time). For all new mothers out there, i think one year off guarantee should stand as it's not just us that make the sacrifice to our bodies, careers and families. There is most likely a partner there as well who is keen on the new arrival. People everywhere say it's all about family but losing your position at work is stressful to think of and shouldn't be a factor or punishment in being fired for having a family.
The article does not talk at all about the problems facing employers trying to maintain a position when someone is gone for one year. It also does not address the issue that taking more time off rather than less is never going to be better for your career, your family yes, your career no. As well have there been any studies on how many women realize they do not want to go back to work at all after learning to live on such a small percentage of their salaries?
I was laid off the day I returned from EI's maternity leave when my first child was born. I took it to the Labour Standards and Human Rights branches and was told I didn't have a case. Nor did I qualify for any more EI benefits because I had used them for maternity leave. Another parent in my child`s school is going through a nasty divorce. Her husband abandoned her and she has since learned that Legal Aid doesn`t do division of family assets or spousal or child support. The courts aren`t allowing her to sell any family assets because her husband hasn`t been served - he lives in Iran now. I feel for her and can`t imagine being in her shoes There is no infrastructure for families. Usually one parent has to fight on behalf of the children and their livelihood. If we truly believed in our children their needs would come first and they don`t. At least if women lived in Africa or perhaps Iran there wouldn`t be any expectation of a support system.
I'd like to know why this article isn't stating the company she worked for. They had no problem firing her, I've seen this happen 3 times and I'm only 30. That means companies know they can still punish women for choosing to have families, does anyone else want to know who this company is?
Some bad situations for sure, but if you take a year off you lose a year of experience and a year of seniority while others are chugging away. I work in law and the women that have kids at the firms I have been at are back in the office within 3 months or so because an entire year off in a profession that requires constantly staying on top of things can be difficult to bounce back from. While an employer has to hold your position for a year, they don't have to guarantee that your decision to take a year off doesn't slow down your career progress. It's a tough economy, jobs are hard to come by, there are lots of people willing to sacrifice anything for their career and millions of people in India, Malaysia and other english speaking countries who would happily work 48 hour weeks for 1/3 of what you get paid AND may have a better education than you do making outsourcing your job and attractive alternative to your employer, and you think there will be no ramifications of taking a year off to bond with your baby? Don't think it works that way anymore (if it ever did) so make whatever choice suits your life, but don't expect the rest of the world to bend over backwards to make it painless.
Nothing against women who face this, but sometimes the employees work ethic or capabilities could factor in. If you're an amazing employee chances are they will so everything in their power to keep you. If not, watch out someone may do a better job than you.
AGREE!
Well said!
Couldn't agree with more. Life is all about choices. You can spend your time at work or with family or try and do both with each suffering to some extent. Unless you negotiate a special deal with an employer that would rather have you part-time than not at all, which presumably means you have a valuable skill set, it is not your employers responsibility to ensure that your career is unaffected by your desire to be a mom or dad. There are more than enough people out there ready to fill your job without any distractions in their personal life, and millions of english speaking, educated people in India, Malaysia and other countries that will happily work 48 hours a week at 1/3 the pay if your job is outsourced. We all make choices, and if you choice is to spend time with your baby that is fantastic, I have kids and think time with kids is valuable, but I don't expect my employer to change the nature of my job to suit my personal life. I always have the choice of taking a different, slower paced, lower paying job, if I want to put "family first" at all times.
What a dumb comment. Let's put this in perpective- all those seniors out there who aren't working should not be given any benefits either or the disabled.
Considering Canada's low birth rate we should be encouraging women to have children so that theres someone to pay taxes when the rest stop working due to old age or disability.
Why should there be support for someone who is unemployed? You can't get something for nothing. Get a job, put in to the system, the system (should) pay you back. CHOOSE to be unemployed (because there's absolutely ZERO reason to be unemployed, imo), you continue to earn what you were making before you got pregnant: nothing.
I can't even begin to fathom your reasoning for why this should be different.
Of course it is... but that's the point of this article I think. It shouldn't be that way. Every woman should be able to get the same treatment when it comes to mat leave.
Harper has nothing to do with this. Stop your fear-mongering!
Very true. Entitled parasistes get more than hardworking hosts.:P No idea why.
You want a baby? The government and taxpayers should'n't subsidize poor planning! If oyu don't save up your own baby fund, then forget about having a baby. If you don't have a spouse that has a job that can support a family, that's your poor selection at work!
That right there is the problem. This article is showing that you can do everything right (by doing exactly what you said, saving for the year off, having a spouse with a job and planning everything out) but when you try to implement those hard made plans someone just changes the rules and people like you expect them to just get over it. Planning and personal savings only go so far when you all of a sudden find yourself without a job, its like being punished after trying to play by all the rules. That is where is inequality and problem is, never knowing if doing everything right will leave you behind.
It's not about not having enough money for a baby...it's about equality for men and women. When a man and woman decide to have a baby, the WOMAN must sacrifice the position she currently has and the money she currently makes for the baby. The man generally doesn't miss a beat. That's the inequality that the Act is trying to compensate for.
We can't tell our little girls to work hard and get your education so that you can succeed in life, and then tell her she just erased everything she worked so hard for in order to have a family with her husband. There has to be some rules in place so that she can at least tread water while she's off and not lose everything.
Obviously, you are a man and have not considered that women can be educated and strive for job satisfaction just as any man does.
How in the world did Steven Harper come into this. He didn't write this article and his rules didn't set up the maternity leave. Get real.
You really should be able to get maternity leave if you don't have a job. My wife and I are having a child and since she just finished a four year degree+ teachers college, she wasnt able to rack up enough hours at her new job before a swollen ankel related to the pregnancy forced her off work. Now, despite both of us having paid thousands in to EI and never claiming any of it, we are not able to get maternity leave. She missed the cutoff for hours by just under 200 which is like five weeks. Because I was also finishing school, I do not have hours either. I realize we were fortunate enough to be educated and its not like missing out on the mat leave is going to leave us destitute, but it woulda been nice. Kind of a dumb system.
No one told you to have a baby! Plan better next time you choose to procreate!
Again, totally agree with this comment. You know when you have enough hours to take mat leave so why try and get pregnant before you've hit that threshold? What were you thinking, and why should anyone care that you couldn't plan it better. You screwed up by 5 weeks so live with the consequences. Next time, check the calendar a little closer and get your timing right.
I agree who are you to tell someone when they should procrate? What about those who will never "have enough"? Should they just never have children even if they are good law abiding citizens? Also, having children can be low cost and it really helped us to get ahead having to live on nothing for a year. We clawed back so much that when I returned to work we have paid down about ten grand in debt prior to me getting pregnant with baby number two.
That is a ridiculous statement. The reason that we need to immigrate people here is because so many people are choosing not to have children. We should be encouraging people to have babies. Also, how many people use the EI system on a regular basis, and then there are those who pay into it and never use it, and now they have a baby and you make those kinds of statements. It's discriminatory against women and families!! You should move to the US with that kind of attitude. Who are you to tell someone when they should procreate or not. Having children actually keeps the economy going.
from a third world country: Canadians are so spoil by their goverment and they are still not satisfied and want more.